Hobo Signs

A bunch of bums guiding each other along the road of life.

Monday, October 08, 2007

Picking up where we left off ...

So would Sarah and I ever consider "this?" If, by this, you (Greg) mean working with officially neglected and semi-neglected children, the answer is a qualified yes. "Why qualified?" you ask. Well, put simply, we have two children with a third on the way; and we are not in a position where we can financially keep Sarah at home. Unfortunately, "professional" ministry pays very poorly; and thus we need to keep Sarah in the work force. So, given that situation, we are extremely diligent in making sure that the time we have with our children is neither passive nor second-rate. In other words, right now, given our current circumstances, we would not choose to work with neglected children. For by doing so, we would be neglecting our own in the process.

But - and this is a very big but - we would consider adopting a child outright. In that case, we would be bringing another child into our home; and he/she would become part of our family - not something we did external to our family time. You see, for me, I don't think there really is a half-way point of engagement. If you and Court are going to actively spend time with children and if you choose to actively open yourselves up to improve their lives, it is almost an inevitability that AT LEAST one child is going to respond to your efforts. And than, at that point, you are going to have to make a decision. Will you continue down the natural path and allow the relationship to continue to build or will you pull back because you're not ready to make the commitment, so to speak.

I guess in some ways, I kind of look at it like dating and marriage. Back when Sarah and I were leading the young adult ministry, I used to talk to kids about dating all the time. And I used to tell them that dating is not an end in and of itself. Dating is the means to discovering whether or not one desires to be married to that individual. Once that discovery is made, action is required. If this is the one, than you need to pull the trigger because dating is not the natural state. Likewise, if this is not the one, you need to end the relationship NOW. Because while you may realize that the two of you are going nowhere, there is no guarantee that he/she is feeling the same way. And the more time you spend together (without the other person terminating the relationship), the more likely it is that the other person is growing more and more attached. And that's why I believe that the moment you know that this individual is not the one, you put an end to it. It's the merciful thing to do.

Same kind of deal here, my friend. If you and Court decide to do this, it is very likely that you will find yourself in a place where a kid takes to you. Even more likely is the probability that multiple kids will take to you. Why wouldn't they? They have NOTHING. The only people that have ever played a significant role in their life have left them for dead (so to speak). So why wouldn't they desperately try to latch on to someone - anyone - who shows them attention and affection? So you will be in the position of power in terms of the dating metaphor. The question is, are you interested in marriage or not. Because this once a week, once-every-two-weeks kind of relationship is not really the norm. It's an in-between state that leads to heart break unless parameters and fences are CLEARLY ESTABLISHED from the outset.

4 Comments:

Blogger Greg said...

So what you're telling me is that a mentor-like relationship does not (or cannot) exist in this type of situation?

(Why do I feel like we're having that "Can Men & Women be friends?" conversation from When Harry met Sally?)

10/08/2007 11:25 AM  
Blogger Just a Few Things about Scott ... said...

I'm not saying that it CAN'T exist. But I am saying that due to the emotional damage that has been done, such a relationship is fraught with all kinds of dangers - mostly for the child. So just be sure, if you decide to do this, that you establish clear boundaries, and that you don't select one child (even if you are leaning that way) until you know that you are ready to go forward. Remember, when you walk away because its not working, you walk away as an emotionally mature adult. What you leave behind is neither as physically nor emotionally mature as you. And thus, the burden is upon you to protect, protect, protect.

10/08/2007 3:39 PM  
Blogger Greg said...

1. I really do appreciate your time and explanation. If we do this, Court and I will be most careful in how we act, and how our time and attention is allocated.

2. I don't want to beat a dead horse or anything, but since the bulk of these kids are legally un-adoptable... do you think this reality has some built-in safe guards? Right off the bat, we make it very clear that we're here for companionship and mentorship, and are in no way parent replacements...

My heart just goes out to these kids, yet I can most certainly understand (and have experienced) how false hope can frick w/ one's mind.

10/09/2007 10:05 AM  
Blogger Just a Few Things about Scott ... said...

Hey Greg,

I'm not saying DON'T do this. I'm just trying to suggest that you really need to be cautious. Even your statement about the kids being non-adoptable based upon their current status ... What do you think the chances are that a kid understands whether or not he is legally freed for adoption? Might he technically understand it? Maybe. Does this change the condition and/or the hopes of his heart? Probably not.

So like I said, I'm not saying DON'T do this. I'm just cautioning you to be very careful and to make sure that you are acting at all times as someone who is protective of their hearts. Remember, these are powerless kids and they see you as having the power to change their lives.

10/09/2007 3:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home