Another brief blog post addressing FDT's purported (*cough Scott cough*) laziness.
I especially identify with this:
It's very frustrating to know that if everyone who would vote for him "if he only had a chance" would actually vote for him, he'd have a chance.
I especially identify with this:
It's very frustrating to know that if everyone who would vote for him "if he only had a chance" would actually vote for him, he'd have a chance.
posted by Matt | 4:38 PM
2 Comments:
Wasn't that the Ross Perot argument back in 1992?
And, to a lesser extent, the Ron Paul argument today? (Although, I am exceedingly tired of the Ron Paul online zealots. I troll them for amusement at this point.)
This column is so fundamentally ridiculous that I don't honestly know what to say. To suggest that we be happy with a President who acts when we need him to act and does nothing when we don't ... As if the state of the world isn't in crisis and demands more than an occasional crisis-management glance. Fred Thompson is getting exactly the kind of results one would expect from the type of campaign he is running. And to suggest that if more people would vote for him he would have chance -- give me a break! Get off your fat, lazy hiney and get out there to tell the people what you stand for. This is an apathetic society. And to expect them to come to you and your online resources. What a joke. Sorry Matt, but the man fails to impress. He may be sound ideologically, but his work ethic is for the birds.
Post a Comment
<< Home